Absent Actual Knowledge Of An Inconsistency, Banks May Rely On Account Number Specified On An Incoming Wire Transfer

Question: If wire transfer instructions designate a valid account number, but an incorrect beneficiary, may the bank that accepts the incoming wire rely upon the account number?

Answer: Yes, assuming the bank did not have actual knowledge of that inconsistency. So said the court of appeal in Los Angeles in TME Enterprises, Inc. v. Norwest Corporation, 04 C.D.O.S. 10834 (December 9, 2004).



In this case, the plaintiffs were victims of a fraudulent investment scheme and sent funds by wire transfer to an account at the defendant bank. The wire transfer instructions included a valid account number but incorrectly designated the account name (as a trust account). The bank processed the wire transfer manually but had no actual knowledge of the inconsistency.

Under these circumstances, the court of appeal held that the bank did not violate Regulation J or the California Commercial Code, which allow a bank to rely upon the account number specified in a wire transfer order as the proper identification for the beneficiary.

Authored by:

Robert J. Stumpf, Jr.

(415) 774-3288

rstumpf@sheppardmullin.com

and

Edward D. Vogel

(619) 338-6529

evogel@sheppardmullin.com

Neither the content on this blog nor any transmissions between you and Sheppard Mullin through this blog are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

In communicating with us through this blog, you should not provide any confidential information to us concerning any potential or actual legal matter you may have. Before providing any such information to us, you must obtain approval to do so from one of our lawyers.

By choosing to communicate with us without such prior approval, you understand and agree that Sheppard Mullin will have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide.
Post A Comment / Question






Remember personal info?