Bank's Failure To Deposit Interpleader Funds With Court Waives Claim For Attorney's Fees
Question: If a bank files an interpleader action and freezes the funds in dispute - but does not deposit them with the court - may this bank still recover its attorney's fees?
Answer: No, according to the Third District Court of Appeal in Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Zinnel, 04 C.D.O.S. 11370 (Dec. 28, 2004).
In this case, the bank, faced with conflicting demands to almost $90,000 in an account, filed an interpleader action but did not deposit the disputed funds with the court. Instead, the bank placed a hold on the account and moved the court for an order directing their deposit and discharging the bank from the action. Finding that one or more of the other parties might assert claims against the bank, the court denied the motion.
Three months later, the bank brought a new motion seeking to discharge its liability (granted) and later moved to recover its legal fees (also granted). On appeal, the court reversed the fees award, holding that since the bank did not voluntarily deposit the disputed funds with the trial court, it had waived its fees claim.
In communicating with us through this blog, you should not provide any confidential information to us concerning any potential or actual legal matter you may have. Before providing any such information to us, you must obtain approval to do so from one of our lawyers.
By choosing to communicate with us without such prior approval, you understand and agree that Sheppard Mullin will have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide.