Rate "Lock In" Agreement Subject To Three-Day TILA Notice

Is a separate agreement whereby a borrower pays a fee for a locked-in interest rate itself subject to the three-day cancellation right under the Truth In Lending Act?

Yes, according to the Ninth Circuit in Jones v. e*Trade Mortgage Corporation, 05 C.D.O.S. 1283.

Here, the bank sent the borrowers a separate agreement under which they paid $400 for a locked-in interest rate. The bank approved the loan and then sent the borrowers the required three-day cancellation notice under TILA. The borrowers backed out and demanded the return of the $400 fee. The bank refused, and the district court dismissed the borrowers' complaint for failure to state a TILA claim.



The Ninth Circuit reversed, holding that the rate lock-in agreement was not a "separate transaction to be distinguished from the loan itself." In other words, it declined to separate the loan into "several transactions [that permit] the lender to extract money from the borrower who exercises his statutory right of decision."

We invite you to suggest topics for the blog. We are happy to consider questions or comments pertaining to general points of Financial Institutions Law. If you desire legal advice, please contact one of our attorneys directly though the 'Contact Us' page of this blog.

Your use of the Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP Financial Institution Law Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP. Your e-mail will not create an attorney-client relationship. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP will have no duty to keep confidential the information that you are now submitting to the firm.
Post A Comment / Question






Remember personal info?