Tag Archives: Mortgage Lenders

Dispelling the Myth of MERS as a “Sham” Beneficiary

In the current flood of mortgage litigation, plaintiffs often rely on myth to avoid paying their debts. One of the most pervasive concerns the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS). Plaintiffs accuse MERS of being a "sham" entity, lacking authority to foreclosure and used by lenders to engage in fraud. In Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, … Continue Reading

Too Little, Too Late For Plaintiff’s Fraud-Based Mortgage Lawsuit

In Vaca v. Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, — Cal.Rptr.3d —-, 2011 WL 3659938 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. 2011), the California Court of Appeal affirmed the dismissal of a fraud claim on statute of limitations grounds. In 2005, the plaintiff sued her ex-husband, claiming he created false credit histories for their children and used those histories to refinance … Continue Reading

To Avoid Assuming Fiduciary Duties, Mortgage Lenders Should Take Care to Avoid Acting as Mortgage Brokers

"A mortgage broker has fiduciary duties to a borrower. A mortgage lender does not."  A decision published on March 28, 2011 by the California Court of Appeals (2 Dist.) clarifies the differences between duties owed to a borrower by a mortgage broker and those owed by a mortgage lender. To avoid potential lawsuits for breach of … Continue Reading
LexBlog

By scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie and Advertising Policy. If you do not wish to accept cookies from our website, or would like to stop cookies being stored on your device in the future, you can find out more and adjust your preferences here.

Agree