Financial Institutions Law Blog

The House Financial Services Committee yesterday voted to amend the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act (the "Act") to require HUD to suspend the implementation of its new Good Faith Estimate and HUD-1 Settlement Statement, and instead to work with the Federal Reserve Board to publish a proposed joint rule with comparable Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA") and Truth in Lending Act ("TILA") disclosures within six months of enactment of the Act, and a final joint rule with comparable RESPA/TILA disclosures within one year of its enactment.

Although we have seen little change in the area of lender liability law over the past decade, today's unprecedented slowdown in the global economy is proving to be fertile ground for disputes among lenders, borrowers, guarantors, and other third parties. During the widespread defaults of the 1980s and early 1990s, lenders pursuing remedies were met by a massive upsurge in claims directed at them. During the mid-1980s, California courts expanded the theories under which lenders could be held liable and often awarded substantial damages to plaintiffs. The late 1980s and early 1990s saw a reversal in this trend, where courts limited some of the more far-reaching lender liability theories and reversed a number of high-profile judgments from previous years.